Grants Funded
Grant applicants for the 2024 cycle requested a total of nearly $3 million dollars. The PSF Study Section Subcommittees of Basic & Translational Research and Clinical Research evaluated more than 100 grant applications on the following topics:
The PSF awarded research grants totaling over $650,000 dollars to support more than 20 plastic surgery research proposals.
ASPS/PSF leadership is committed to continuing to provide high levels of investigator-initiated research support to ensure that plastic surgeons have the needed research resources to be pioneers and innovators in advancing the practice of medicine.
Research Abstracts
Search The PSF database to have easy access to full-text grant abstracts from past PSF-funded research projects 2003 to present. All abstracts are the work of the Principal Investigators and were retrieved from their PSF grant applications. Several different filters may be applied to locate abstracts specific to a particular focus area or PSF funding mechanism.
Standardization of Clinical Outcomes for Cleft Care and Research
Alexander Allori MD
2013
Duke University Medical Center
Pilot Research Grant
Cranio / Maxillofacial / Head and Neck
While cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is one of the most common and treatable birth defects in the United States (affecting approximately 1:700 infants born annually), and although guidelines for clinical care have been developed, little is known about the effectiveness and quality of cleft treatments that are rendered. Most of the scientific evidence is limited to single-institution case series and expert opinion. The CDC has formally acknowledged that there is a pressing need to understand the core issues affecting outcomes in the CLP population. However, before robust clinical data can be obtained, consensus must be reached regarding which outcomes should be formally assessed. There is a critical need for identification of these outcomes and for development of a standardized method by which to assess these outcomes. The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) has officially concurred that "an agreed set of data standards is crucial" for both quality improvement endeavors and clinical research. In the absence of such knowledge, the development of strategies to improve care will likely remain problematic. Our long-term goal is to better understand clinically relevant outcomes in contemporary cleft care and to develop strategies for quality improvement. The purpose of this project is to develop a standardized framework that identifies which outcomes are important and specifies how they are best measured. Modeled after a recent, successful pilot project devoted to studying surgical outcomes, this project will convene three multidisciplinary expert panels specific to surgical, dental/orthodontic, and speech/audiologic outcomes. The standardized framework will define goals for each intervention and identify, classify, and prioritize clinical outcomes. The end result will constitute a set of shared objectives for cleft care, including a universal “language” for how to discuss them and a standardized method by which they should be appraised. This framework will be instrumental for all future outcomes research, comparative effectiveness research, quality improvement efforts, and development of policy.
