Grants Funded
Grant applicants for the 2024 cycle requested a total of nearly $3 million dollars. The PSF Study Section Subcommittees of Basic & Translational Research and Clinical Research evaluated more than 100 grant applications on the following topics:
The PSF awarded research grants totaling over $650,000 dollars to support more than 20 plastic surgery research proposals.
ASPS/PSF leadership is committed to continuing to provide high levels of investigator-initiated research support to ensure that plastic surgeons have the needed research resources to be pioneers and innovators in advancing the practice of medicine.
Research Abstracts
Search The PSF database to have easy access to full-text grant abstracts from past PSF-funded research projects 2003 to present. All abstracts are the work of the Principal Investigators and were retrieved from their PSF grant applications. Several different filters may be applied to locate abstracts specific to a particular focus area or PSF funding mechanism.
Evaluating High Fidelity Cleft Lip Simulation for Education&Assessing Competence
Carolyn Rogers-Vizena MD
2018
Children's Hospital Boston
National Endowment for Plastic Surgery Grant
Education, Cranio / Maxillofacial / Head and Neck
Simulation has proven a useful tool both for teaching junior surgeons and for assessing technical competence. It is used for these purposes in many disciplines, including general surgery, minimally invasive surgery, urology, and more. The abstract nature of many plastic surgery procedures makes developing and validating simulators more challenging than for other specialties. This study fills that void by rigorously evaluating the content and construct validity of a recently developed high-fidelity unilateral cleft lip surgical simulator. This prospective cohort study will evaluate technical performance and perceived comfort level of trainees of varying levels before and after three attempts at operating on the unilateral cleft lip simulator (initial uncoached attempt, after debriefing, and three months later). Subjects' confidence performing cleft lip repair will be assessed before and after the intervention. Each attempt at the operation will be formally evaluated using the validated “Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance,” a novel composite cleft lip repair score, and direct anthropometry. To assess content validity and knowledge retention (ie. value as a teaching tool) scores from attempts 1 (before debrief), 2 (after debrief), and 3 (3 months later) will be compared within individuals. To assess construct validity, scores across participant levels will be compared to determine the degree to which the simulator can discriminate between learner levels. Demonstrating content and construct validity are essential before any simulator is integrated into formal surgical education and before it can be utilized as an instrument to evaluate competency. The specific aim of this research study is to determine if a high fidelity cleft lip simulator possesses these qualities with the longer-term goal of integrating this and other high fidelity simulators into plastic surgery and training credentialing and thus improving patient care.
