Grants Funded
Grant applicants for the 2024 cycle requested a total of nearly $3 million dollars. The PSF Study Section Subcommittees of Basic & Translational Research and Clinical Research evaluated more than 100 grant applications on the following topics:
The PSF awarded research grants totaling over $650,000 dollars to support more than 20 plastic surgery research proposals.
ASPS/PSF leadership is committed to continuing to provide high levels of investigator-initiated research support to ensure that plastic surgeons have the needed research resources to be pioneers and innovators in advancing the practice of medicine.
Research Abstracts
Search The PSF database to have easy access to full-text grant abstracts from past PSF-funded research projects 2003 to present. All abstracts are the work of the Principal Investigators and were retrieved from their PSF grant applications. Several different filters may be applied to locate abstracts specific to a particular focus area or PSF funding mechanism.
Pilot study validation of the BREAST-Q REACT
Jonas Nelson MD
2022
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Pilot Research Grant
Breast (Cosmetic / Reconstructive), Economics/Quality/Outcomes
Impact Statement: This project will improve the practice of plastic surgery by optimizing a platform for incorporating real-time feedback on patient-reported outcomes into routine care for breast cancer patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Despite the BREAST-Q's status as a standard patient-reported outcome measure, patients and providers do not yet have a means of meaningfully interpreting scores. This project will accelerate the uptake of BREAST-Q as a means of informing clinical decisions and identification of poor outcomes earlier among breast cancer survivors.
Project Summary: We aim to elevate the clinical value of the BREAST-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), by creating a real-time score interpretation tool for clinical decision-making. This addresses the critical need for a generalized framework for utilization of PROMs in postmastectomy breast reconstruction clinical practice. We are uniquely positioned to address this barrier because of our established infrastructure for BREAST-Q administration, leading to strong clinical engagement with BREAST-Q from patients and clinicians (BREAST-Q response rates of ~90%). We will use our new BREAST-Q Reconstruction Engagement and Communication Tool (BREAST-Q REACT), a score interpretation tool integrated into the electronic health record, to provide breast cancer patients and providers with individualized comparisons of an individual patient's scores to those of the “average patient” and recommendations for corresponding actions in real time. Ours is the first set of reference values to represent the expected BREAST-Q score trajectory up to 2 years after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Our central hypothesis is that patients and providers will find the ability to receive real-time feedback regarding an individual patient's progress relative to other patients who have undergone similar procedures to have high clinical applicability and utility. We will test our hypothesis using two aims. Aim 1: Assess patient perception of patient-facing BREAST-Q REACT design and clinical utility. In focus groups with breast reconstruction patients grouped based on modality and timing from reconstructive surgery, we will demonstrate the patient-facing REACT to participants and elicit feedback regarding its design, functionalities, and clinical utility. Aim 2: Assess provider perception of provider-facing BREAST-Q REACT design, clinical utility, and workflow integration. In focus groups with plastic surgeons, breast surgeons, and advanced practice providers, we will demonstrate the provider-facing REACT to participants and elicit feedback regarding its design, functionalities, and clinical utility. The long-term objective of our proposal is to use BREAST-Q REACT to provide automated, real-time clinical decision support and allow earlier identification of poor outcomes to improve the quality of life and satisfaction of breast cancer survivors. This pilot study will provide the foundation for a randomized study evaluating the effects of REACT on the quality of real-time patient care.
